Effects of various surface treatments on the bonding efficacy of noncarious cervical sclerotic lesions / 华西口腔医学杂志

Noncarious cervical sclerotic lesions (NCSL) are dental cervical lesions with noncarious sclerotic dentine (NCSD), which appears smooth, hard, and either light yellow or dark brown. Most NCSLs are wedge or dish shaped and commonly occur in canines and premolars, leading to dental hypersensitivity and aesthetic defect. The principal treatment is composite resin restoration; however, many clinical problems, such as retention loss, should not be ignored. NCSL's bonding interface includes NCSD and enamel, and interface pre-treatment can promote the bonding effect. This review summarizes current surface treatment methods and their influence on the bonding effectiveness of NCSL to provide guidance for clinical practice.

Load to failure of three different monolithic zirconia inlay- retained fixed dental prosthesis designs with three surface treatments / Carga até falha de três diferentes desenhos de inlays de zircônia monolítica com três tratamentos de superfície

Objective: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of different preparation designs and different surface treatments on the fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia inlay-retained fixed dental prosthesis [IRFDP]. Material and methods: Forty-five translucent zirconia IRFDPs were divided into three groups according to preparation designs (n = 15); group I: proximal box, group II: inlay-box and group III: butterfly wing (modified inlay). Each group was further subdivided into three subgroups according to the surface treatments utilized (n = 5); sandblasting, tribochemical silica coating (Cojet system) and erbium, chromium: Yttrium, scandium, gallium, garnet (Er, Cr: YSGG) laser irradiation. All zirconia IRFDPs were cemented to their respective resin models using selfadhesive resin cement. All cemented IRFDPs were subjected to fracture resistance test using universal testing machine. The initial fracture site was determined by using a stereomicroscope (x6.7magnification). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the effect of different designs, different surface treatments and their interaction on the mean fracture resistance. Bonferroni's post-hoc test was used when ANOVA is significant (P ≤ 0.05). Results: Butterfly wings design showed the highest fracture resistance values followed by inlay and box designs respectively (P ≤ 0.05). Sandblasting and Cojet showed significantly the highest mean fracture resistance values than Laser with no significance difference between them. Conclusion: The butterfly wing design increased the fracture resistance of the zirconia IRFDPs. Sandblasting and tribochemical silica coating of zirconia surfaces had a greater effect than Er, Cr: YSGG laser to gain higher fracture resistance of zirconia IRRDPs (AU)

Objetivo: O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar o efeito de diferentes modelos de preparações e diferentes tratamentos de superfície na resistência à fratura de inlays de zircônia monolítica. Material e métodos: Quarenta e cinco inlays translúcidos de zircônia foram divididos em três grupos de acordo com os desenhos de preparação (n = 15); grupo I: caixa proximal, grupo II: inlay convencional e grupo III: asa de borboleta (inlay modificado). Cada grupo foi subdividido em três subgrupos de acordo com os tratamentos de superfície utilizados (n = 5); jateamento de areia, revestimento triboquímico de sílica (sistema Cojet) e érbio, cromo: ítrio, escândio, gálio, granada (Er, Cr: YSGG) irradiação a laser. Todos os inlays de zircônia foram cimentados em seus respectivos modelos de resina usando cimento de resina auto-adesivo. Todos os inlays cimentados foram submetidos a teste de resistência à fratura usando máquina de teste universal. O local inicial da fratura foi determinado usando um estereomicroscópio (ampliação de 6,7x). A análise de variância (ANOVA) de dois fatores foi usada para avaliar o efeito de diferentes desenhos, diferentes tratamentos de superfície e sua interação na resistência média à fratura. O teste post-hoc de Bonferroni foi usado quando a ANOVA foi significativa (P ≤ 0,05). Resultados: O design das asas de borboleta apresentou os maiores valores de resistência à fratura, seguidos pelos designs de inlay convencional e caixa, respectivamente (P ≤ 0,05). O jateamento de areia e o Cojet apresentaram significativamente os maiores valores médios de resistência à fratura do que o Laser, sem diferença de significânc=ia entre eles. Conclusão: O design da asa de borboleta aumentou a resistência à fratura dos inlays de zircônia. O revestimento por jato de areia e triboquímica de sílica das superfícies de zircônia teve um efeito maior que o laser Er, Cr: YSGG para obter maior resistência à fratura dos inlays de zircônia. (AU)

Repair bond strength of resin composite to bilayer dental ceramics

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of various surface treatments (ST) on the shear bond strength of resin composite to three bilayer dental ceramics made by CAD/CAM and two veneering ceramics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three different bilayer dental ceramics and two different veneering ceramics were used (Group A: IPS e.max CAD+IPS e.max Ceram; Group B: IPS e.max ZirCAD+IPS e.max Ceram, Group C: Vita Suprinity+Vita VM11; Group D: IPS e.max Ceram; Group E: Vita VM11). All groups were divided into eight subgroups according to the ST. Then, all test specimens were repaired with a nano hybrid resin composite. Half of the test specimens were subjected to thermocycling procedure and the other half was stored in distilled water at 37℃. Shear bond strength tests for all test specimens were carried out with a universal testing machine. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences among the tested surface treatments within the all tested fracture types (P .00125). CONCLUSION: This study revealed that HF etching for glass ceramics and sandblasting for zirconia ceramics were adequate for repair of all ceramic restorations. The effect of ceramic type exposed on the fracture area was not significant on the repair bond strength of resin composites to different ceramic types.

Influence of different surface treatments on bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to resin cement

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of different surface treatments on the bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to resin cement by four point bending test. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CAD/CAM materials under investigation were e.max CAD, Mark II, Lava Ultimate, and Enamic. A total of 400 bar specimens (4×1.2×12 mm) (n=10) milled from the CAD/CAM blocks underwent various pretreatments (no pretreatment (C), hydrofluoric acid (A), hydrofluoric acid + universal adhesive (Scotchbond) (AS), sandblasting (Sb), and sandblasting + universal adhesive (SbS)). The bars were luted end-to-end on the prepared surfaces with a dual curing adhesive resin cement (Variolink N, Ivoclar Vivadent) on the custom-made stainless steel mold. Ten test specimens for each treatment and material combination were performed with four point bending test method. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test. RESULTS: The surface treatment and type of CAD/CAM restorative material showed a significant effect on the four point bending strength (FPBS) (P < .001). For LDC, AS surface treatment showed the highest FPBS results (100.31 ± 10.7 MPa) and the lowest values were obtained in RNC (23.63 ± 9.0 MPa) for control group. SEM analyses showed that the surface topography of CAD/CAM restorative materials was modified after treatments. CONCLUSION: The surface treatment of sandblasting or HF acid etching in combination with a universal adhesive containing MDP can be suggested for the adhesive cementation of the novel CAD/CAM restorative materials.

Influence of Surface Treatments and Adhesive Systems on Lithium Disilicate Microshear Bond Strength

Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microshear bond strength of ceramic prosthetic structures reinforced by lithium disilicate cemented with resin cement under conditions of different surface treatments and adhesive systems. Seventy-two rectangular blocks of lithium disilicate (6.5 mm long × 5 mm wide × 1 mm thick) were fabricated, air abraded with 50-μm Al2O3 particles and divided into six groups (n=12) depending on the surface pretreatments. The groups were as follows: 10HF/S/SBM: 10% hydrofluoric acid etched for 20 s (10HF) + silane (S) + Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SBM); 10HF/S/SB: 10HF + S + Single Bond Universal (SB); 10HF/SBM; 10HF/SB; S/SBM and S/SB. Two 1-mm-long plastic tubes were placed on the specimens, filled with RelyX ARC resin cement and cured for 20 s per tube. The plastic tube was removed, and the microshear bond strength was tested. Data were submitted to analysis of variance and Tukey's tests (α=0.05). Fractured specimens were observed under optical microscopy. For both adhesives, the bond strengths (MPa) of groups treated with acid-etching and silane (10HF/S/SB: 24.82, 10HF/S/SBM: 24.90) were higher (p<0.001) than those of groups treated with acid-etching (10HF/SB: 16.47, 10HF/SBM: 19.94) only or only silane (S/SB: 18.42, S/SBM: 13.24). All groups showed a predominance of failure adhesive. The silanization should be a clinical step in cementing ceramic structures reinforced by lithium disilicate, even with the application of universal adhesive that contains silane in its formulation.

Resumo O objetivo neste estudo foi avaliar a resistência de união ao microcisalhamento de estruturas protéticas cerâmicas reforçadas por dissilicato de lítio cimentadas com cimento resinoso sob diferentes tratamentos de superfície e sistemas adesivos. Setenta e duas barras retangulares de dissilicato de lítio (6,5 mm de comprimento × 5 mm de largura × 1 mm de espessura) foram fabricadas, tratados com partículas de Al2O3 (50 μm) e dividido em seis grupos (n=12) dependendo dos pré-tratamentos de superfície. Os grupos foram como se segue: 10HF/S/SBM: condicionamento com ácido fluorídrico 10% durante 20 s (10HF) + silano (S) + Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SBM); 10HF/S/SB: 10HF + S + Single Bond Universal (SB); 10HF/SBM; 10HF/SB; S/SBM; e S/SB. Dois tubos plásticos cilíndricos de 1 mm de comprimento foram colocados sobre os espécimes, preenchidos com cimento RelyX ARC e fotoativado durante 20 s por tubo. Os tubos plásticos foram removidos e a resistência de união ao microcisalhamento foi testada. Os dados foram submetidos à análise de variância e ao teste de Tukey (α=0,05). Espécimes fraturados foram observados sob microscopia óptica. Para ambos os adesivos, a resistência de união (MPa) dos grupos tratados com condicionamento ácido e silano (10HF/S/SB: 24,82, 10HF/S/SBM: 24,90) foram superiores (p<0.001) aos grupos tratados com condicionamento ácido apenas (10HF/SB: 16,47, 10HF/SBM: 19,94) ou apenas silano (S/SB: 18,42, S/SBM: 13,24). Todos os grupos apresentaram uma predominância de falha adesiva. A silanização deve ser um passo clínico em cimentação de estruturas cerâmicas reforçadas por dissilicato de lítio, mesmo com a aplicação do adesivo universal que contém em sua formulação um silano.

Surface Treatments for Repair of Feldspathic, Leucite - and Lithium Disilicate-Reinforced Glass Ceramics Using Composite Resin

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of different surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of a restorative composite repair in three types of dental ceramics: lithium disilicate-reinforced, leucite-reinforced and feldspathic. Twelve blocks were sintered for each type of ceramic (n=3) and stored for 3 months in distilled water at 37 °C. The bonding surface of ceramics was abraded with 600-grit SiC paper. Surface treatments for each ceramic were: GC (control) - none; GDB - diamond bur #30 µm; GHF - hydrofluoric acid (10%); GT- tribochemical silica coating (45-μm size particles). Treatments were followed by cleaning with phosphoric acid 37% for 20 s + silane + adhesive. The composite resin was used as restorative material. After repair, samples were subjected to thermocycled ageing (10,000 cycles between 5 °C and 55 °C for 30 s). Thereafter, the samples were sectioned into 1.0 mm2 sticks and tested for microtensile bond strength with 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed. Data were compared by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). The superficial wear with diamond bur proved to be suitable for feldspathic porcelain and for leucite-reinforced glass ceramic while hydrofluoric acid-etching is indicated for repairs in lithium disilicate-reinforced ceramic; tribochemical silica coating is applicable to leucite-reinforced ceramic. Predominance of adhesive failures was observed (>85% in all groups). In conclusion, the success of surface treatments depends on the type of ceramic to be repaired.

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a eficácia de diferentes condicionamentos de superfície na resistência de união de reparos de compósitos restauradores em três tipos de cerâmicas odontológicas: reforçada por dissilicato de lítio, reforçada por leucita e feldspática. Foram confeccionados 12 blocos para cada tipo de cerâmica (n=3) e armazenados por 3 meses em água destilada a 37 oC. A superfície de união das cerâmicas foi regularizada com lixa de granulação 600 por 15 s e lavadas em ultrassom por 10 min. Os tratamentos de superfície para cada cerâmica foram: GC (controle) - nenhum; GPD - ponta diamantada com 30 µm de granulação; GAF - ácido hidrofluorídrico a 10%; GJ - jateamento com partículas de óxido de alumínio revestido por sílica (45 µm - tamanho das partículas). Após, foi realizada a limpeza da superfície com ácido fosfórico a 7% por 20 s, seguido de silano e adesivo. Como material restaurador foi utilizada resina composta. Após o reparo, as amostras foram submetidas a ciclagem térmica (10,000 ciclos entre 5 °C e 55 °C, por 30 s). Na sequência, as amostras foram seccionadas em palitos de aproximadamente 1,0 mm2 e levadas ao teste de tração em uma máquina de ensaios universal à velocidade de 0,5 mm/min. Os dados obtidos foram comparados estatisticamente por ANOVA de dois fatores e teste de Tukey (α=0,05). Sugere-se que o desgaste da superfície com ponta diamantada é mais indicado para a cerâmica feldspática e cerâmica reforçada por leucita, enquanto o condicionamento com ácido fluorídrico é indicado para reparos em cerâmica reforçada por dissilicato de lítio. O jateamento com partículas de óxido de alumínio revestido por sílica mostrou-se aplicável à cerâmica reforçada por leucita. Predominancia de fraturas adesivas acima de 85% foi observada para todos os grupos. Este estudo demonstrou que o sucesso dos tratamentos de superfície depende do tipo de cerâmica a que são aplicados.

Avaliação das superfícies de implantes dentários com tratamento a laser / Evaluation of dental implant surfaces with laser treatment

O objetivo deste trabalho foi apresentar uma revisão da literatura sobre superfícies de implantes dentários com tratamento a laser. O laser é uma amplificação da luz que, dependendo de sua intensidade e interação com a matéria, é capaz de gerar mudanças morfológicas e químicas em ligas de metais, como as de titânio, usadas em Odontologia. Diversos tipos de tratamentos a laser vêm sendo estudados para criar superfícies rugosas em implantes dentais osseointegráveis. Atualmente, as superfícies rugosas de implantes dentários, comparadas às superfícies usinadas, apresentam melhor resposta biológica do hospedeiro, diminuindo o período de osseointegração e permitindo ao profissional que realize reabilitações protéticas mais rápidas e seguras.

The aim of this work is to present a literature review regarding dental implants surfaces treated by lasers. Laser is a light amplifi cation that depending of the intensity and matter interaction, is capable to cause morphologic and chemical changes in metal alloys, such as, titanium alloy used in dentistry. Several types of surface laser treatments has been studied to create rough surfaces in osseointegrated dental implants. In the last few years, the rough surfaces of dental implants compared to machined surfaces, presented better biologic response of the host, reducing the osseointegration period, enabling professionals to have a possibility to perform faster and more secure prosthodontic rehabilitation.

Effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength of diatomite-based dental ceramic / 国际生物医学工程杂志

Objective To investigate the effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength between diatomite-based dental ceramic and IPS e.max veneering ceramic.Methods Diatomite-based dental ceramic was randomly divided into acid-etched group,sandblasting group and untreated group,and then sintered with IPS e.max veneering ceramic,respectively.Shear bond strength were detected,and the interface microstructures and elemental distribution were observed by scanning electron microscope-energy dispersive spectrometer (SEM-EDS).Results Shear bond strength of acid-etched group was significantly higher than that of untreated group (P＜0.01).SEM observation results showed that the interface of acid-etched group bonded closely.There was no statistical difference of the shear bond strength between the sandblasting group and untreated group (P＞0.05).Conclusions Acid-etched treatment can significantly enhance the bond strength of diatomite-based dental ceramic and IPS e.max veneering ceramic.

Effect of Surface Treatment of Fiberglass Posts on Bond Strength to Root Dentin

This study evaluated the influence of the surface treatments of fiberglass posts on bond strength to root dentin using push-out test. Forty bovine incisor roots were endodontically treated. The surface of the fiberglass posts (Exacto #2, Angelus) were treated using 4 different protocols (n=10): Control - 70% ethanol for 1 min; 37% phosphoric acid for 1 min; 10% hydrofluoric acid for 1 min; and 24% hydrogen peroxide for 1 min. After a silane coupling agent was applied for 1 min and all posts were cemented using self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX Unicem, 3M-ESPE). The roots were sectioned and two 1-mm-thick slices were obtained from each third: cervical, middle and apical. The specimens were subjected to the push-out test with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA followed by Tukey's HSD tests (=0.05). The surface treatment (p<0.001) and root third region (p=0.007) factors were significant. The retention to root canal was affected by surface treatment type. The post surface treatment with 24% hydrogen peroxide for 1 min yielded significantly higher bond strength when the fiberglass posts were cemented with RelyX Unicem.

Este estudo avaliou a influência de tratamentos de superfície de pinos de fibra de vidro na resistência de união à dentina radicular por meio do teste de push-out. Quarenta raízes de incisivos bovinos foram submetidas a tratamento endodôntico. A superfície dos pinos de fibra de vidro (Exacto #2, Angelus) foram tratadas com 4 protocolos diferentes (n=10): Controle - 70 % de etanol durante 1 min; 37 % de ácido fosfórico durante 1 min, 10% de ácido fluorídrico durante 1 min e 24 % de peróxido de hidrogênio durante 1 min. Depois foi aplicado agente de união silano por 1 min e todos os pinos foram cimentados com cimento resinoso auto-adesivo (RelyX Unicem, 3M- ESPE). As raízes foram seccionadas e foram obtidas duas fatias de 1 mm de espessura em cada terço: cervical, médio e apical. Os espécimes foram submetidos ao teste de push-out com uma velocidade de 0.5 mm/min. Os dados foram analisados pelo teste ANOVA com medidas repetidas, seguido pelo teste de Tukey HSD (=0,05). Os fatores tratamento de superfície (p<0,001) e região do terço radicular (p=0,007) foram significantes; no entanto, a interação entre os dois fatores não foi significante (p=0,827). A retenção ao canal radicular foi afetada pelo tipo de tratamento de superfície. O tratamento de superfície com 24% de peróxido de hidrogênio por 1 min rendeu significativamente maior resistência de união quando os pinos de fibra de vidro foram cimentados com RelyX Unicem.

Caracterização da superfície do implante dental Titaoss / Surface characterization of Titaoss dental implant

A superfície dos implantes dentais é um fator determinante para o sucesso da osseointegra­ção, sendo caracterizada principalmente por parâmetros de rugosidade. Objetivos: caracterizar a topografia da superfície do implante Titaoss. Material e métodos: cinco implantes Titaoss com plataforma de hexágono externo e diâmetro 4,1 mm e 13 mm de com­primento de diferentes lotes foram analisados por microscopia eletrônica de varredura (MEV) e interferometria, para avaliação da morfologia e rugosidade da superfície. Resultados: as imagens de MEV demonstraram uma alta frequência de pequenas estruturas, que são características do tratamento de duplo ataque ácido. A quantificação numérica da rugosidade demonstrou uma altura média das estruturas (Sa) de 0,55 ± 0,16 μm com um incremento da área de superfície (Sdr) de 15,14 ± 3,78% e concentração de picos (Sds) de 0,102 ± 0,010/μm2. Conclusão: a superfície do implante Titaoss apresenta microestruturas decorrentes do tratamento com duplo ataque ácido compatíveis com outros sistemas de implantes já consolidados no mercado internacional. Estudos posteriores são necessários para comprovação clínica longitudinal do sistema.

The surface of dental implants, which is characterized by roughness parameters, is a key factor to determine the success of osseointegration. Objectives: to characterize the surface topography of Titaoss dental implant. Material and methods: five implants with external hexagon connection in 4.1 mm diameter platform and length of 13 mm from different batches were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and by interferometry to identify the surface morphology and quantify roughness. Results: SEM images exhibited high frequency of short structures, which are common in dual acid-etched surfaces. The numerical analysis of roughness reported a mean height deviation of the structures (Sa) of 0.55 ± 0.16 μm and an increase of surface area (Sdr) of 15.14 ± 3.78% with summit concentration (Sds) of 0.102 ± 0.010/μm2. Conclusion: the Titaoss implant presented surface microstructures due to dual acid treatment compatible with other implants already established in the international market. Further studies are necessary to ensure the long-term clinical success of this new implant system

The influence of surface treatment on the implant roughness pattern

An important parameter for the clinical success of dental implants is the formation of direct contact between the implant and surrounding bone, whose quality is directly influenced by the implant surface roughness. A screw-shaped design and a surface with an average roughness of Sa of 1-2 µm showed a better result. The combination of blasting and etching has been a commonly used surface treatment technique. The versatility of this type of treatment allows for a wide variation in the procedures in order to obtain the desired roughness. OBJECTIVES: To compare the roughness values and morphological characteristics of 04 brands of implants, using the same type of surface treatment. In addition, to compare the results among brands, in order to assess whether the type of treatment determines the values and the characteristics of implant surface roughness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three implants were purchased directly from each selected company in the market, i.e., 03 Brazilian companies (Biomet 3i of Brazil, Neodent and Titaniumfix) and 01 Korean company (Oneplant). The quantitative or numerical characterization of the roughness was performed using an interferometer. The qualitative analysis of the surface topography obtained with the treatment was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy images. RESULTS: The evaluated implants showed a significant variation in roughness values: Sa for Oneplant was 1.01 µm; Titaniumfix reached 0.90 µm; implants from Neodent 0.67 µm, and Biomet 3i of Brazil 0.53 µm. Moreover, the SEM images showed very different patterns for the surfaces examined. CONCCLUSIONS: The surface treatment alone is not able to determine the roughness values and characteristics.

The effect of reinforcing methods on fracture strength of composite inlay bridge / 대한치과보존학회지

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of surface treatment and composition of reinforcement material on fracture strength of fiber reinforced composite inlay bridges. The materials used for this study were I-beam, U-beam TESCERA ATL system and ONE STEP(Bisco, IL, USA). Two kinds of surface treatments were used; the silane and the sandblast. The specimens were divided into 11 groups through the composition of reinforcing materials and the surface treatments. On the dentiform, supposing the missing of Maxillary second pre-molar and indirect composite inlay bridge cavities on adjacent first pre-molar disto-occlusal cavity, first molar mesio-occlusal cavity was prepared with conventional high-speed inlay bur.The reinforcing materials were placed on the proximal box space and build up the composite inlay bridge consequently. After the curing, specimen was set on the testing die with ZPC. Flexural force was applied with universal testing machine (EZ-tester; Shimadzu, Japan). at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min until initial crack occurred. The data wasanalyzed using one-way ANOVA/Scheffes' post-hoc test at 95% significance level. Groups using I-beam showed the highest fracture strengths (p 0.05). Most of the specimens in groups that used reinforcing material showed delamination. 1. The use of I-beam represented highest fracture strengths (p 0.05). 3. The reinforcing materials affect the fracture strength and pattern of composites inlay bridge. 4. The holes at the U-beam did not increase the fracture strength of composites inlay bridge.

The effects of surface treatments on shear bond strengths of light-cured and chemically cured glass ionomer cements to enamel / 대한치과교정학회지

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of surface conditioning with 10% polyacrylic acid, etching with 38% phosphoric acid, and polishing with a slurry of pumice on shear bond strengths of light-cured glass ionomer cement, chemically cured glass ionomer cement, and a composite resin to enamel, and to observe the failure patterns of bracket bondings. Shear bond strengths of glass ionomer cements were compared with that of a composite resin. Metal brackets were bonded on the extracted human bicuspids after enamel surface treatments, and samples were immersed in the 37degrees C distilled water bath, and shear bond strengths of glass ionomer cements and a composite resin were measured on the Instron machine after 24hrs passed, and the deboned samples were measured in respect of adhesive remnant index. Scanning electron micrographs were taken of enamel surfaces after various treatments. The data were evaluated and tested by ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test, and those results were as follows. 1. Shear bond strength of light-cured glass ionomer cement showed statistically higher than that of chemically cured glass ionomer cement. 2. Shear bond strengths of light-cured and chemically cured glass ionomer cements to enamel treated with 10% polyacrylic acid and 38% phosphoric acid showed statistically higher than those with a slurry of pumice. 3. According to scanning electron micrographs, enamel surface conditioned with 10% polyacrylic acid is slightly etched and cleaned, that etched with 38% phosphoric acid is severely etched, and that polished with a slurry of pumice is irregulary scretched and not completely cleaned. 4. After debonding, light-cured glass ionomer cement to enamel treated with 10% polyacrylic acid showed less residual materials on the enamel surface than composite resin to enamel etched with 38% phosphoric acid. 5. There was no significant difference in the shear bond strength of light-cured glass ionomer cement to enamel treated with 10% polyacrylic acid and that of composite resin to enamel etched with 38% phosphoric acid.